Italian organisations within the European nanotechnology network: presence, dynamics and effects

  • Giuseppe Calignano Department of History, Society and Human Studies, University of Salento, Via V.M. Stampacchia, 73100 Lecce
Keywords: Geography of knowledge, EU research policy, nanotechnology, Italy

Abstract

Nanotechnology is an emerging interdisciplinary field that, according to the European Commission, represents one of the world’s new technological frontiers. Nanoscience and nanotechnology play a key role in European Union research policies; they have been included among the “seven priority thematic areas” of the Sixth Framework Programme and the “nine themes” of the Cooperation Programme of the Seventh Framework Programme. The purpose of this study is to assess the role of Italian organisations in the existing European nanotechnology innovation network and to illuminate several aspects of relational and geographical dynamics as well as the scientific and economic effects of these partnerships in Italy. Using an official document issued by the European Commission entitled “Mapping Portal for Nanotechnology Research” and adopting social network analysis techniques, statistics and qualitative interviews, it is determined that Italy plays a central role in the European nanotechnology network, that Italian organisations have tended to replicate satisfactory prior collaborations, that other factors have been more significant than geographical proximity in creating research groups and developing projects, and, finally, that scientific effects have been substantially more significant than economic effects at the national level.

References

Airi Nanotec 2011a: Comunicato Stampa. Airi: micro e nanotecnologie al centro della giornata Airi per l’innovazione industriale. – Roma. – Online available at: http://www.barabino.it/upload/documenti/COS_AIRI_10.05.pdf, 03/08/2014

Airi Nanotec 2011b: Third Italian nanotechnology census. – Roma

Amin, A. 2002: Spatialities of globalisation. – Environment and Planning A 34 (3): 385-399

Asheim, B.T., P. Cooke and R. Martin (eds.) 2006: Clusters and regional development; critical reflections and explorations. – London

Autant-Bernard, C., P. Billand, D. Frachisse and N. Massard 2007: Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. – Papers in Regional Science 86 (3): 495-519

Baker, S.E. and R. Edwards (eds.) 2012: How many qualitative interviews is enough? Expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research. – National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. – Online Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2273/4/how_many_interviews.pdf, 31/07/2014

Barber, M.J., A. Krueger, T. Krueger and T. Roediger-Schluga

: The network of EU-funded collaborative R&D projects. – Physical Review E 73: 036132

Binz, C. and B. Truffer 2011: Technological innovation systems

in multi-scalar space. Analyzing an emerging water recycling industry with social network analysis. – Geographica Helvetica 66 (4): 254-260

Borgatti, S.P., M.G. Everett and L.C. Freeman 2002: Ucinet

for Windows: Software for social network analysis. – Harvard, MA

Borrás, S. and D. Tsagdis 2008: Cluster policies in Europe: firms, institutions, and governance. – Cheltenham

Boschma, R. 2005: Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. – Regional Studies 39 (1): 61-74

Braczyk, H.-J., P. Cooke and M. Heidenreich (eds.) 1998: Regional innovation systems; the role of governances in a globalized world. – London

Cairncross, F. 1997: The death of distance: how the communications revolution will change our lives. – Cambridge

Caloghirou, Y., A. Tsakanikas and N.S. Vonortas 2001: University-industry cooperation in the context of the European

Framework Programmes. – The Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (1-2): 153-161

Castells, M. 1996: The rise of the network society. – Oxford et al.

Castells, M. 2004: An introduction to the information age. – In: Webster F., R. Blom, E. Karvonen, H. Melin, K. Nordenstreng and E. Puoskari (eds.): The information society reader. – London et al.: 138-149

Cooke, P., M. Gomez Uranga and G. Etxebarria 1997: Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisational dimensions. – Research Policy 26: 475-491

Cooke, P., M. Gomez Uranga and G. Etxebarria 1998: Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective. – Environment and Planning A 30 (9): 1563-1584

Corbisiero, F. 2014: Analisi delle reti sociali. – Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II. – Online available at: https://www.docenti.unina.it/downloadPub.do?tipoFile=md&id=383461, 03/08/2014

Di Bello, G. 2013: Industrial competitiveness in Horizon 2020: Towards an integrated planning framework for key enabling technologies. – APRE – Agency for the Promotion of European Research. – Online available at: https://community.oecd.org/servlet/JiveServlet/preview-Body/50271-102-1-94171/Di%20Bello_Report_%20Industrial%20Leadership_H2020.pdf, 22/12/2013

Etzkowitz, H. 1997: The triple helix: academy-industry-government relations and the growth of neo-corporatist industrial policy in the U.S. – In: Campodall’Orto, S. (ed.): Managing technological knowledge transfer: Proceedings from COST A3 Workshop in Milan, Italy, February 1-2, 1996. – EC Social Sciences COST A3, Vol. 4. – Luxembourg: 1-20

Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff 2000: The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. – Research

Policy 29 (2): 109-123

Etzkowitz, H., J. Dzisah, M. Ranga and C. Zhou 2007: The triple helix model of innovation. University-industry-government interaction. – Asia Pacific Tech Monitor 24 (1): 14-23

European Commission 2007a: FP 7 in brief. How to get involved in the EU 7th Framework Programme for Research. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/

research/FP 7/pdf/FP 7-inbrief_en.pdf, 22/12/2013

European Commission 2007b: Improving knowledge transfer between research institutions and industry across Europe. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/knowledge_transfe_07.pdf, 22/12/2013

European Commission 2007c: FP 7 hands-on guide. – Belgium.

– Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/

sme-techweb/pdf/sme_handson_en.pdf, 22/12/2013

European Commission 2010: Europe 2020. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/

index_en.htm, 22/12/2013

European Commission 2011: FP 7 Third country agreements. International instruments associating third countries to FP 7. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/FP 7/docs/third_country_agreements_en.pdf, 22/12/2013

European Commission 2013a: Mapping portal for nanotechnology research FP 6/7 Projects. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_

technologies/pdf/ec-nanotechnology-research-mapping_

en.pdf, 22/12/2013

European Commission 2013b: Fact sheet: International Participation in Horizon 2020. – Luxembourg. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/pdf/press/fact_sheet_on_international_participation_in_horizon_2020.pdf, 22/12/2013

European Council 2000: Presidency conclusions, Lisbon European Council, 23 and 24 March 2000. – Online available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/

docs/pressdata/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm, 22/12/2013

Fitjar, R.D. and A. Rodríguez-Pose 2011: Innovating in the

periphery: firms, values, and innovation in southwest Norway. – European Planning Studies 19 (4): 555-574

Freeman, C. 1991: Network of innovators: a synthesis of research issues. – Research Policy 20 (5): 499-514

Freeman, L.C. 1979: Centrality in social networks. Conceptual

clarification. – Social Networks 1 (3): 215-239

Frenken, K. 2000: A complexity approach to innovation networks. The case of the aircraft industry (1909-1997). – Research Policy 29 (2): 257-272

Frenken, K. 2002: A new indicator of European integration and an application to collaboration in scientific research. – Economic Systems Research 14 (4): 345-361

Frenken, K., S. Hardeman and J. Hoekman 2009: Spatial

scientometrics: towards a cumulative research program. – Journal of Informetrics 3 (3): 222-232

Georghiou, L. 1999: Socio-economic effects of collaborative R&D – European experiences. – The Journal of Technology

Transfer 24 (1): 69-79

Granovetter, M. 1985: Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. – American Journal of Sociology

(3): 481-510

Hakala, J., P. Kutinlahti and E. Kaukonen 2002: Becoming international, becoming European: EU research collaboration at Finnish universities. – Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 15 (4): 357-379

Istat 2013: Ricerca e Innovazione. – In: Istat: Bes 2013. Il

benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. – Rome: 229-249

KMU Forschung Austria and Oxford Research 2010: Expost evaluation of NMP (FP 6) strategic level. Strategic impact, no revolution. Final Report. – Kristiansand. – Online available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/nmp-FP 6-ex-post-evaluation_en.pdf, 30/07/2014

Knoke, D. and S. Yang 2008: Social network analysis. – London

Leydesdorff, L. and H. Etzkowitz 1998: The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. – Science & Public Policy 25 (3): 195-203

Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.) 1992: National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. – London

Maggioni, M.A. and T.E. Uberti 2011: Networks and geography in the economics of knowledge flows. – Quality and Quantity 45 (5):1031-1051

Nelson, R.R. (ed.) 1993: National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. – New York et al.

Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca MIUR 2012: 7⁰ programma quadro di ricerca e sviluppo dell’unione europea. Dati della partecipazione italiana. – Rome. – Online available at: http://www.ricercainternazionale.miur.it/media/9122/settimo_programma_quadro_dati_partecipazione_italiana.pdf , 01/08/2014

Nokkala, T. 2007: Network building, motivation and learning

in inter-organisational R&D collaboration projects. Theoretical considerations. – NEMO Working Paper 4. – Guildford. – Online available at: http://epubs.surrey.ac.uk/1571/1/fulltext.pdf, 30/07/2014

Pohoryles, R.J. 2002: The making of the European research area – a view from research networks. – Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 15 (4): 325-340

Porter, M.E. 2000: Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. – Economic

Development Quarterly 14 (1): 15-34

Porter, A.L. and J. Youtie 2009: How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? – Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11 (5): 1023-1041

Roco, M.C. 2003: Nanotechnology: convergence with modern biology and medicine. – Current Opinion in Biotechnology 14 (3): 337-346

Roco, M.C. and W.S. Bainbridge 2005: Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Maximizing human benefit. – Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7 (1): 1-13

Roediger-Schluga, T. and M.J. Barber 2006: The structure of R&D collaboration networks in the European Framework Programmes. – UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2006-36. – Maastricht. – Online available at: http://arno.unimaas.nl/show.cgi?fid=6621, 30/07/2014

Roediger-Schluga, T. and M.J. Barber 2007: R&D collaboration networks in the European Framework Programmes: Data processing, network construction and selected results. – UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2007-032. – Maastricht. – Online available at: http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2007/wp2007-032.pdf, 30/07/2014

Scherngell, T. and M.J. Barber 2010: Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: evidence from the fifth EU Framework Programme. – The Annals of Regional Science 46 (2): 247-266

Scott, J. 1991: Social network analysis. A handbook. – London

Silvani, A. 2010: La ricerca europea ed il Programma Quadro. – In: Sirilli, G. (ed.): La produzione e la diffusione della conoscenza. Ricerca, innovazione e risorse umane. – Roma

Torre, A. 2008: On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. – Regional Studies 42 (6): 869-889

Trigilia, C. 2008: La costruzione sociale dell’innovazione. – Firenze

Uotila, T., V. Harmaakorpi and H. Melkas 2006: A method for assessing absorptive capacity of a regional innovation system. – Fennia 184 (1): 49-58

Uyarra, E. 2010: What is evolutionary about ‘regional systems of innovation’? Implications for regional policy. – Journal of Evolutionary Economics 20 (1): 115-137

Uzzi, B. 1997: Social structure and competition in interfirm

networks: the paradox of embeddedness. – Administrative

Science Quarterly 42 (1): 35-67

Wasserman, S. and K. Faust 1994: Social network analysis: methods and application. – Structural analysis in the social sciences 8. – Cambridge

Wagner, C. and L. Leydesdorff 2005: Network structure, selforganization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. – Research Policy 34 (10): 1608-1618

Wired and Cotec 2009: La cultura dell’innovazione in Italia. Rapporto 2009. – Milano

Published
2014-12-11
How to Cite
Calignano, G. (2014). Italian organisations within the European nanotechnology network: presence, dynamics and effects. DIE ERDE – Journal of the Geographical Society of Berlin, 145(4), 241-259. https://doi.org/10.12854/erde-145-21
Section
Research articles